Is neuroeconomics doomed by the reverse inference fallacy?

Mind and Society 9 (2):229-249 (2010)
Abstract
Neuroeconomic studies are liable to fall into the reverse inference fallacy, a form of affirmation of the consequent. More generally neuroeconomics relies on two problematic steps, namely the inference from brain activities to the engagement of cognitive processes in experimental tasks, and the presupposition that such inferred cognitive processes are relevant to economic theorizing. The first step only constitutes the reverse inference fallacy proper and ways to correct it include a better sense of the neural response selectivity of the targeted brain areas and a better definition of relevant cognitive ontologies for neuroeconomics. This second way also allows increased coherence between the cognitive processes actually involved in neuroeconomics experiments and the theoretical constructs of economics. We suggest means of increasing neural response selectivity in neuroeconomic experimental paradigms. We also discuss how the choice of cognitive ontologies can both avoid implicit reductionist strategies (from economic constructs to neural patterns) and irrelevance, as cognitive processes engaged in experimental tasks may lack immediate bearing on the study of economic behavior. With these joint improvements neuroeconomics can be a progressive science
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11299-010-0076-z
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,627
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred From Neuroimaging Data?Russell A. Poldrack - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2):59-63.
Special Sciences.Jerry A. Fodor - 1974 - Synthese 28 (2):97-115.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What's on Your Mind? A Brain Scan Won't Tell.Yakir Levin & Itzhak Aharon - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (4):699-722.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Neuroeconomics: More Than Inspiration, Less Than Revolution.N. Emrah Aydinonat - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):159-169.
Decision-Making: A Neuroeconomic Perspective.Benoit Hardy-Vallée - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (6):939–953.
Comments on Neuroeconomics.Ariel Rubinstein - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):485-494.
The Methodologies of Neuroeconomics.Glenn Harrison & Don Ross - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):185-196.
The Disunity of Neuroeconomics: A Methodological Appraisal.Roberto Fumagalli - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):119-131.
What's on Your Mind? A Brain Scan Won't Tell.Yakir Levin & Itzhak Aharon - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (4):699-722.
Function and Mechanism: The Metaphysics of Neuroeconomics.Michiru Nagatsu - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):197-205.
Prediction, Inference, and the Homunculus.Horace B. Barlow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):750-751.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-14

Total downloads

47 ( #109,406 of 2,157,997 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #47,022 of 2,157,997 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums