Journal of the Philosophy of History 13 (2):183-215 (2019)

In this paper, I would like to show that Koselleck’s thesis on the dissolution of the topos historia magistra vitae in modernity is open to certain objections, to the extent that one finds in modernity a number of practical conceptions of history which are “useful for life”. My own thesis is that the topos of history as the “Guide to Life” is not so much dissolved as rather transformed with modernity, and in a sense which has to be specified. This point of view will be defended with reference to European authors of the nineteenth century, though I will add some observations on the twentieth century in the last part of the paper.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18722636-12341390
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,118
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reference Framework for Active Learning in Higher Education.Pranav Naithani - 2008 - In Abdulla Al-Hawaj, Wajeeh Elali & E. H. Twizell (eds.), Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Issues and Challenges. Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 113-120.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #676,980 of 2,324,566 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #464,303 of 2,324,566 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes