Philosophy 76 (3):435-442 (2001)

Barry Smith
State University of New York, Buffalo
Berit Brogaard
University of Miami
Imagine that your body has become attached, without your permission, to that of a sick violinist. The violinist is a human being. He will die if you detach him. Such detachment seems, nonetheless, to be morally permissible. Thomson argues that an unwantedly pregnant woman is in an analogous situation. Her argument is considered by many to have established the moral permissibility of abortion even under the assumption that the foetus is a human being. Another popular argument is that presented by Singer and Unger to the effect that even those who are moderately prosperous are morally obliged to help the poor if they can do so at relatively small cost to themselves. The paper considers the question whether these two arguments can be simultaneously valid.
Keywords Judith Jarvis Thomson  violinist thought experiment  Peter Singer  Peter Unger
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819101000377
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Abortion and the Concept of a Person.Jane English - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):233 - 243.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
285 ( #32,644 of 2,448,359 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #44,507 of 2,448,359 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes