Constellations:1-17 (2020)

Authors
Christos Boukalas
Lancaster University
Abstract
For over a decade now we live under an economic crisis, its metastases, and its effects. Since the turn of the century, we live under recurring security crises and state attempts to prevent them. This article examines the temporal horizons of the strategies the neoliberal state employs to combat the spectre of crisis in its two quintessential fields of action: the economy and security. It notes a pronounced contrast: whereas security strategy is pre-emptive, economic strategy is reactive. These two opposite strategies aim to the same result: to cancel the future. Security strategy seeks to pre-emptively neutralise the possibility of non-liberal politics, canceling the possibility of political change. By not intervening proactively, economic strategy seeks to guarantee that the economy will remain as it is, averting economic change. This attempt of the state to cancel the future is symptomatic of a malaise affecting the capitalist class. Having fully conquered social resistance, the capitalist class tries to render the moment of its triumph permanent, fixing society in an eternal present. For the first time in its history, the capitalist class has neither vision nor appetite for the future. This signals its hegemonic implosion.
Keywords hegemony  temporal sovereignty  financial crisis  counterterrorism  pre-emption  time  future  state crisis
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
DOI 10.1111/1467-8675.12469
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,448
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Trust and Power.Niklas Luhmann - 1982 - Studies in Soviet Thought 23 (3):266-270.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Degrees of Influence and the Problem of Pre-Emption.Cei Maslen - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):577 – 594.
On Getting One's Retaliation in First.Suzanne Uniacke - 2007 - In Henry Shue & David Rodin (eds.), Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification. Oxford University Press.
The Politics of Temporal Sovereignty and the Subaltern MA.Jeremy Valentine - 2019 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 18 (2-3):99-119.
Hegemonic Sovereignty: Carl Schmitt, Antonio Gramsci and the Constituent Prince.Andreas Kalyvas & Nicole Darat Guerra - 2017 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 6 (11):193-248.
Riegel V. Medtronic, Inc.: Revisiting Pre-Emption for Medical Devices.Bruce Patsner - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (2):305-317.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-03-25

Total views
6 ( #1,099,306 of 2,446,171 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,899 of 2,446,171 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes