Social Epistemology 18 (2 & 3):215 – 246 (2004)

Abstract
Scientific measurements are made objective through the use of reliable instruments. Instruments can have this function because they can - as material objects - be investigated independently of the specific measurements at hand. However, their materiality appears to be crucial for the assessment of their reliability. The usual strategies to investigate an instrument’s reliability depend on and assume possibilities of control, and control is usually specified in terms of materiality of the instrument and environment. The aim of this paper is to investigate the problem of reliability for non-material instruments, the instruments being applied in the social sciences. Any possible lack of reliability of the instrument hinders the measurements of ever becoming objective.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0269172042000249309
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,491
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Data and Phenomena.Jim Woodward - 1989 - Synthese 79 (3):393 - 472.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Verisimilitudinarian Analysis of the Linda Paradox.Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi & Roberto Festa - 2012 - VII Conference of the Spanish Society for Logic, Methodology and Philosphy of Science.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
68 ( #142,304 of 2,381,236 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #266,919 of 2,381,236 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes