Wittgenstein's critique of Frazer

Ratio 20 (4):357–376 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic exposition of what Wittgenstein took to be the fundamental error committed by James George Frazer, author of the classic anthropological work The Golden Bough, in his account of ritual practices. By construing those rituals in scientific or rationalistic terms, as aimed at the production of certain effects, Frazer ignores, according to Wittgenstein, their expressive and symbolic dimension. It is, moreover, an error to try to explain the powerful emotions evoked even today by traditions such as fire festivals (which may once have involved human sacrifice) by searching for their causal origins in history or prehistory; the disquieting nature of such practices needs to be understood by attending to the inner meaning they already have in our human lives. Certain important general lessons are drawn about the necessarily limited power of scientific and causal explanations when it comes to alleviating many of our fundamental perplexities not just in the area of anthropology but in philosophy as well.1.

Other Versions

reprint Bouveresse, Jacques (2008) "Wittgenstein's Critique of Frazer". In Preston, John, Wittgenstein and Reason, pp. 1–20: Wiley-Blackwell (2008)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,411

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and spengler vis-à-vis Frazer.Aydan Turanli - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (1):69-88.
Wittgenstein and Anthropology.Brian R. Clack - 2017 - In Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 627–638.
Wittgenstein on Vaihinger and Frazer.Carlos Alves Pereira - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (1):145-165.
Wittgenstein on Freud and Frazer.Frank Cioffi - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Understanding Misunderstanding.Gilad Nir - 2023 - In Carla Carmona, David Perez-Chico & Chon Tejedor (eds.), Intercultural Understanding After Wittgenstein. Anthem.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#229,587)

6 months
15 (#315,159)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Wittgenstein and the genteel tradition.Reza Hosseini - 2019 - South African Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):287-296.
L. Wittgensteino psichologijos ir religijos filosofija.Nerijus Stasiulis - 2019 - Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies and Art 100.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references