Ori Friedman
University of Waterloo
Since ancient times, legal systems have held owners responsible for harm caused by their property. Across 4 experiments, we show that children aged 3–7 also hold owners responsible for such harm. Older children judge that owners should repair harm caused by property, and younger children may do this as well. Younger and older children judge that owners should apologize for harm, even when children do not believe the owners allowed the harm to occur. Children are also as likely to hold owners responsible for harm caused by property as for harm caused by the owners themselves. The present findings contribute to psychological accounts of ownership by showing that ownership not only confers rights to control property, but also responsibility for harm caused by property. The findings also contribute to our understanding of the attribution of responsibility, and challenge accounts claiming that directly causing harm, or allowing it to happen, is a prerequisite for responsibility. The findings provide support for an account claiming that property is an extension of its owner, and likewise reveal that responsibility for harm caused by property is an early developing aspect of the psychology of ownership. 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
Keywords *Childhood Development  *Cognitive Development  *Ownership  *Responsibility  *Social Cognition  Test Construction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1037/xge0000429
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concept of Property.Frank Snare - 1972 - American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (2):200 - 206.
The Moral Functions of an Apology.Kathleen Gill - 2000 - Philosophical Forum 31 (1):11–27.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Self-Ownership is Prescriptively Impotent.Evan Fox-Decent - 1998 - Journal of Value Inquiry 32 (4):489-506.
Enforcement Rights and Rights to Reparation.Peter Vallentyne - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:813-820.
Embodiment and Self-Ownership: Daniel C. Russell.Daniel C. Russell - 2010 - Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (1):135-167.
Intrinsic Limitations of Property Rights.J. M. Elegido - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):411 - 416.
Property and Rights.Jan Narveson - 2010 - Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (1):101-134.


Added to PP index

Total views
775 ( #7,664 of 2,448,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
305 ( #1,400 of 2,448,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes