Studies in Christian Ethics 25 (3):277-294 (2012)
AbstractEngineers make an enormous contribution to promoting the wellbeing of individuals and the communities in which they live, but engineering may also give rise to adverse consequences. Engineering therefore requires ethical awareness, and professional engineers often use ethical codes to guide their actions. The content of the Royal Academy of Engineering’s authoritative Statement of Ethical Principles is discussed and compared to the paradigmatic Rule of St Benedict. This leads to suggestions for the development of an enriched code for engineering that considers not only what actions are desirable but also how and why they should be carried out. Issues arising in the formulation of an enriched code acceptable also to those of no explicit faith or of other faiths are considered. It is suggested that the development of enriched professional codes is a general and strategically important challenge for theological ethics
Similar books and articles
Professional Responsibility: The Role of the Engineer in Society.Steven P. Nichols - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):327-337.
The Professional Engineer: Virtues and Learning.Simon Robinson & Ross Dixon - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):339-348.
Sustaining Engineering Codes of Ethics for the Twenty-First Century.Diane Michelfelder & Sharon A. Jones - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):237-258.
Theoretical Considerations for a Meaningful Code of Professional Ethics.Karim Jamal & Norman E. Bowie - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):703 - 714.
The Role of Professional Codes in Regarding Ethical Conduct.Nicola Higgs-Kleyn & Dimitri Kapelianis - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):363 - 374.
The Role of Professional Societies: Codes of Conduct and Their Enforcement.Stephanie J. Bird - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):315-320.
Professional Codes: Why, How, and with What Impact? [REVIEW]Mark S. Frankel - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):109 - 115.
Codes of Ethics — Towards a Rule-Utilitarian Justification.William C. Starr - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 2 (2):99 - 106.
Ethics for All: Differences Across Scientific Society Codes.Merry Bullock & Sangeeta Panicker - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):159-170.
Ethical Standards for Human Resource Management Professionals: A Comparative Analysis of Five Major Codes. [REVIEW]Carolyn Wiley - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 25 (2):93 - 114.
What Can We Learn by Looking for the First Code of Professional Ethics?Michael Davis - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (5):433-454.
Applied Ethics: Practices, Goods, and Rules.David Lorenzo - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (1):61-68.
The Mining Engineer, Moral Luck, and Professional Accountability.Vassilios N. Kazakidis & Rachel F. C. Haliburton - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (4):437-456.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Dissolving the Engineering Moral Dilemmas Within the Islamic Ethico-Legal Praxes.Abdul Kabir Hussain Solihu & Abdul Rauf Ambali - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):133-147.
Eighteen Rules for Writing a Code of Professional Ethics.Michael Davis - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):171-189.
Engineering Ethics, Individuals, and Organizations.Michael Davis - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (2):223-231.
Ethics and the Engineer: Developing the Basis of a Theological Approach.W. Richard Bowen - 2010 - Studies in Christian Ethics 23 (3):227-248.