Informal Logic 41 (1):81-106 (2021)

Authors
Abstract
In this paper, I consider whether there are limits to virtuous argumentation in certain situations. I consider three types of cases: 1) arguing against denier discourses, 2) arguing with people who make bigoted claims, and 3) cases in which marginalised people are expected to exercise virtues of argument from a position of limited agency. For each type of case, I look at where limits to arguing responsibly might be drawn. I argue that there are situations in which we might withdraw from engagement for practical reasons and others in which withdrawing or refraining from engagement is a responsible way to deal with a particular position. Finally, I argue that in the third type of case, expecting the marginalised to argue as though on even terms with the positions of the dominant risks perpetrating argumentative harm.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.22329/il.v41i1.6696
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,968
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Epistemic Emotions.Adam Morton - 2010 - In Peter Goldie (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion. Oxford University Press. pp. 385--399.
Virtue in Argument.Andrew Aberdein - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):165-179.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Emergent Vs. Dogmatic Arguing.Marco Rühl - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):151-171.
One Thought Too Few: Where De Dicto Moral Motivation is Necessary.Ron Aboodi - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (2):223-237.
Could There Have Been Unicorns?Marga Reimer - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1):35 – 51.
Why Take Notes?Julie Loveland Swanstrom - 2020 - Teaching Philosophy 43 (3):281-302.
Editor's Note.Gow & Kim - 2014 - Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 5 (2).
Biomedical Moral Enhancement in the Face of Moral Particularism.Pei-Hua Huang & Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:189-208.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-03-04

Total views
2 ( #1,386,945 of 2,433,271 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #293,577 of 2,433,271 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes