The Asymmetry Thesis and the Diversity of "Invalid" Argument-Forms

Informal Logic 19 (1) (1999)

Abstract
According to the Asymmetry Thesis, whereas there are many kinds of argument-forms that make at least some of their instances valid, there is none that makes any of its instances invalid. To refute this thesis, a counterexample has been produced in the form of an argument-form whose premise-form's instances are all logically true and whose conclusion form's instances are all logically false. The purpose of this paper is to show that there are many more kinds of argument-forms that make some of their instances invalid and that, hence, are counterexamples refuting the Asymmetry Thesis
Keywords asymmetry Thesis, Gerald J. Massey, argument-forms, invalidity, Hasty Generalization
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,481
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Can We Ever Pin One Down to a Formal Fallacy?Erik Cw Krabbe - 1996 - In J. F. A. K. van Benthem (ed.), Logic and Argumentation. North-Holland.
Propositional Relevance.George Bowles - 1990 - Informal Logic 12 (2).
Tom, Dick, and Harry, and All the King's Men.Gerald J. Massey - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):89 - 107.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-03

Total views
11 ( #662,424 of 2,248,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #796,127 of 2,248,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature