Episteme:1-16 (forthcoming)

Authors
Kenneth Boyd
University of Toronto, St. George Campus (PhD)
Abstract
There have been many discussions recently from philosophers, cognitive scientists, and psychologists about group polarization, particularly with regards to political issues and scientific issues that have become markers of social identity, such as anthropogenic climate change and vaccine hesitancy. Online and social media environments in particular have received a lot of attention in these discussions, both because of people’s increasing reliance on such environments for receiving and exchanging information, and because such environments often allow individuals to selectively interact with those who are like-minded. My goal here is to argue that the group epistemologist can facilitate understanding the kinds of factors that drive group polarization in a way that has been overlooked by the existing research. Specifically, I argue that polarization can occur in part because of the ways that members of a group treat the group itself (as opposed to an individual member within that group) as a source of information, and in doing so makes their own position, as well as that of the group, more extreme. I refer to this as a structural factor in driving polarization, as it is a factor that is produced by the general nature of the relationship between a group and its members.
Keywords groups  group epistemology  polarization  social epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/epi.2020.47
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Law of Group Polarization.Cass R. Sunstein - 2002 - Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2):175–195.
Group Assertion.Jennifer Lackey - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (1):21-42.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Twisted Thinking: Technology, Values and Critical Thinking.Lavinia Marin - 2022 - Prometheus. Critical Studies in Innovation 38 (1):124-140.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks.Carlo Proietti - 2016 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 287.
Epistemic Autonomy and Group Knowledge.Chris Dragos - 2019 - Synthese 198 (7):6259-6279.
The Dynamics of Group Polarization.Carlo Proietti - 2017 - In Alexandru Baltag, Jeremy Seligman & Tomoyuki Yamada (eds.), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10455. Springer. pp. 195-208.
Gender, Race & Group Disagreement.Martin Miragoli & Mona Simion - 2020 - In Adam Carter & Fernando Broncano-Berrocal (eds.), The Epistemology of Group Disagreement. pp. 125-138.
Group Beliefs.Raimo Tuomela - 1992 - Synthese 91 (3):285-318.
Social Knowledge and Supervenience Revisited.Mark Povich - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (5):1033-1043.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-10-10

Total views
376 ( #26,933 of 2,506,110 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
70 ( #11,477 of 2,506,110 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes