Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):51-60 (2004)
The use of terminal sedation to control theintense discomfort of dying patients appearsboth to be an established practice inpalliative care and to run counter to the moraland legal norm that forbids health careprofessionals from intentionally killingpatients. This raises the worry that therequirements of established palliative care areincompatible with moral and legal opposition toeuthanasia. This paper explains how thedoctrine of double effect can be relied on todistinguish terminal sedation from euthanasia. The doctrine of double effect is rooted inCatholic moral casuistry, but its applicationin law and morality need not depend on theparticular framework in which it was developed. The paper further explains how the moral weightof the distinction between intended harms andmerely foreseen harms in the doctrine of doubleeffect can be justified by appeal to alimitation on the human capacity to pursue good.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Ethics Philosophy of Medicine General Surgery History of Medicine|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Continuous Sedation Until Death as Physician-Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia: A Conceptual Analysis.S. H. Lipuma - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (2):190-204.
Disambiguating Clinical Intentions: The Ethics of Palliative Sedation.L. A. Jansen - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (1):19-31.
The Lacking of Moral Equivalency for Continuous Sedation and PAS.Samuel H. LiPuma - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):48 - 49.
Ist terminale Sedierung medizinisch sinnvoll oder ersetzbar?Dr med D. Beck - 2004 - Ethik in der Medizin 16 (4):334-341.
„Terminale Sedierung“.Prof Dr H. Christof Müller-Busch - 2004 - Ethik in der Medizin 16 (4):369-377.
Similar books and articles
The Paradox of Self-Defense: Saving Oneself by Harming Another.Whitley R. P. Kaufman - 2009 - Lexington Books.
Terminal Sedation: An Emotional Decision in End-of-Life Care.S. N. Etkind - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):508-509.
Internists' Attitudes Towards Terminal Sedation in End of Life Care.L. C. Kaldjian - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):499.
Is the Doctrine of Double Effect Irrelevant in End-of-Life Decision Making?Peter Allmark, Mark Cobb, B. Jane Liddle & Angela Mary Tod - 2010 - Nursing Philosophy 11 (3):170-177.
Double-Effect Reasoning: Doing Good and Avoiding Evil.T. A. Cavanaugh - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Four Versions of Double Effect.Donald B. Marquis - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.
Narratives of 'Terminal Sedation', and the Importance of the Intention-Foresight Distinction in Palliative Care Practice.Charles D. Douglas, Ian H. Kerridge & Rachel A. Ankeny - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (1):1-11.
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads348 ( #8,003 of 2,168,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #43,312 of 2,168,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?