Classical Quarterly 46 (02):591- (1996)

George Boys-Stones
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
In chapters 30–1 of the de Stoicorum repugnantiis, Plutarch sets out to show that the Stoics involve themselves in self-contradiction if they claim that their philosophy allows them an intelligible notion of providence. In the first place, he says, this is so because the traditional boons which men expect to receive from the gods do not benefit them at all if they do not have wisdom. Indeed, the fool uses all things badly, so that to give him anything at all without giving him virtue should be positively harmful to him. Yet the gods never give virtue to anyone so, on this score, they benefit no one either
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/cq/46.2.591
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,219
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Plutarch's Dualism and the Delphic Cult.Radek Chlup - 2000 - Phronesis 45 (2):138-158.
Plutarch's Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy (Review).Dimitrios Dentsoras - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):372-373.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #783,276 of 2,448,370 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,223 of 2,448,370 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes