Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (4):197-200 (1986)

Abstract
The authors report and comment on student reactions to a clinical example of moral choice in the microallocation of scarce resources. Four patients require dialysis simultaneously, but only one kidney machine is available. What moral, as opposed to clinical, criteria are available to determine who should have priority?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.12.4.197
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,304
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
26 ( #376,044 of 2,330,096 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #393,046 of 2,330,096 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes