Journal of Business Ethics 97 (2):325 - 338 (2010)
This article examines why an organization might wish to manage workplace romance, and describes a number of alternative approaches to managing dating. At first sight the ethics of dating bans balances the need to protect female employees from harassment against employee rights to privacy and freedom of association — a rights versus rights issue. However, dating bans seem not to be directed at protecting female employees from harm, but rather protect employers from sexual harassment liability claims -an employer self-interest versus employee rights issue. This article advocates a consequentialist approach to the problem, via the factoring in of other harms caused by prohibiting workplace romance. Given that most workplace romances end up in marriage or long-term partnerships, a ban on workplace romance is argued to be antisocial. The incidence of sexual harassment is very low in comparison to the number of longterm relationships initiated in the workplace. This article concludes by citing examples of firms that encourage romance, showing that is feasible to manage any resulting problems within these firms' existing conflict of interest and sexual harassment rules
|Keywords||dating ban divorce marriage office romance sexual harassment workplace romance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Reconcilable Differences Confronting Beauty, Pornography, and the Future of Feminism.Lynn S. Chancer - 1998
Citations of this work BETA
Virtual Special Issue on ‘Sociology and Business Ethics’.Burrell Gibson - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics.
Workplace Romance 2.0: Developing a Communication Ethics Model to Address Potential Sexual Harassment From Inappropriate Social Media Contacts Between Coworkers. [REVIEW]Lisa A. Mainiero & Kevin J. Jones - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2):367-379.
Similar books and articles
Organizational Characteristics and HRM Policies on Rights: Exploring the Patterns of Connections. [REVIEW]Catherine E. Schwoerer, Douglas R. May & Benson Rosen - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (7):531 - 549.
Sexual Harassment: Why the Corporate World Still Doesn't “Get It”. [REVIEW]Vaughana Macy Feary - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (8):649 - 662.
Acknowledging Informal Power Dynamics in the Workplace: A Proposal for Further Development of the Vicarious Liability Doctrine in Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment Cases.Susan Carle - manuscript
Rights in the Workplace: A Nozickian Argument. [REVIEW]Ian Maitland - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):951 - 954.
On the Persistence of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace.S. Gayle Baugh - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (9):899-908.
Implementing Business Ethics: Sexual Harassment. [REVIEW]Karen A. Crain & Kenneth A. Heischmidt - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (4):299 - 308.
Added to index2010-06-09
Total downloads58 ( #90,923 of 2,171,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #76,319 of 2,171,974 )
How can I increase my downloads?