Aggregating Causal Judgments

Philosophy of Science 81 (4):491-515 (2014)
Abstract
Decision-making typically requires judgments about causal relations: we need to know the causal effects of our actions and the causal relevance of various environmental factors. We investigate how several individuals' causal judgments can be aggregated into collective causal judgments. First, we consider the aggregation of causal judgments via the aggregation of probabilistic judgments, and identify the limitations of this approach. We then explore the possibility of aggregating causal judgments independently of probabilistic ones. Formally, we introduce the problem of causal-network aggregation. Finally, we revisit the aggregation of probabilistic judgments when this is constrained by prior aggregation of qualitative causal judgments.
Keywords Judgment aggregation  Causation  Causal judgments  Expert testimony  Bayesian networks  Probabilistic opinion pooling
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/678044
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation.Pauly Marc & Hees Martin Van - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (6):569 - 585.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Aggregating Infinitely Many Probability Measures.Frederik Herzberg - 2015 - Theory and Decision 78 (2):319-337.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

113 ( #42,802 of 2,157,997 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #54,308 of 2,157,997 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums