A defence of the Ramsey test

Mind 116 (461):1-21 (2007)
Abstract
According to the Ramsey Test hypothesis the conditional claim that if A then B is credible just in case it is credible that B, on the supposition that A. If true the hypothesis helps explain the way in which we evaluate and use ordinary language conditionals. But impossibility results for the Ramsey Test hypothesis in its various forms suggest that it is untenable. In this paper, I argue that these results do not in fact have this implication, on the grounds that similar results can be proved without recourse to the Ramsey test hypothesis. Instead they show that a number of well entrenched principles of rational belief and belief revision do not apply to conditionals
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzm001
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,178
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Genealogy of Trust.Paul Faulkner - 2007 - Episteme 4 (3):305-321.
Old Adams Buried.Ian Rumfitt - 2013 - Analytic Philosophy 54 (2):157-188.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

88 ( #57,277 of 2,153,479 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #105,172 of 2,153,479 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums