Ancestor Simulations and the Dangers of Simulation Probes

Erkenntnis:1-11 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Preston Greene (2020) argues that we should not conduct simulation investigations because of the risk that we might be terminated if our world is a simulation designed to research various counterfactuals about the world of the simulators. In response, we propose a sequence of arguments, most of which have the form of an "even if” response to anyone unmoved by our previous arguments. It runs thus: (i) if simulation is possible, then simulators are as likely to care about simulating simulations as they are likely to care about simulating basement (i.e. non-simulated) worlds. But (ii) even if simulations are interested only in simulating basement worlds the discovery that we are in a simulation will have little or no impact on the evolution of ordinary events. But (iii) even if discovering that we are in a simulation impacts the evolution of ordinary events, the effects of seeming to do so could also happen in a basement world, and might be the subject of interesting counterfactuals in the basement world Finally, (iv) there is little reason to think that there is a catastrophic effect from successful simulation probes, and no argument from the precautionary principle can be used to leverage the negligible credence one ought have in this. Thus, if we do develop a simulation probe, then let’s do it.

Similar books and articles

Is the Simulation Theory of Memory About Simulation?Nikola Andonovski - 2019 - Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia 10 (3):37.
Simulation and the Predictive Brain.Daniel Dohrn - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
Simulation Theory.Joe Cruz & Robert M. Gordon - 2002 - In L. Nagel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques in the Simulation of Chemical Reaction Mechanisms.Michael Eisenberg - forthcoming - Ai and Simulation: Theory and Applications (Simulation Series Vol. 22, No. 3.). Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego. Ca.
Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243-255.
Simulation and Cognitive Penetrability.Jane Heal - 1996 - Mind and Language 11 (1):44-67.
Simulation and Calibration: Mitigating Uncertainty.Deborah Haar - 2021 - Philosophy of Science 88 (5):985-996.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-28

Downloads
93 (#130,915)

6 months
50 (#20,148)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Braddon-Mitchell
University of Sydney
Andrew James Latham
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243-255.
Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243-255.
Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?By Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243–255.

View all 10 references / Add more references