Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4):447 - 460 (2009)
Smith's famous invocation of the invisible hand -according to which self-interest promotes the greater good — has popularly been seen as a fundamental challenge to business ethics, a field committed to the opposite premise that the public interest cannot be advanced unless economic egoism is restrained by a more socially conscious mindset, one that takes into account the legitimate needs of stakeholders and the reciprocity inherent in networked relationships. Adam Smith has been brought into the discipline to show that his authority cannot be summoned to fully support the free market sceptics of business ethics. Little has been done, however, to illustrate that Smith's moral writings actually contain the fundamentals of a business ethics teaching for managers who necessarily work within a variety of networks. This article analyses his moral thought to infer a Smithean framework of business ethics for managers. Smith believes that self-interest should be subordinated to moral imperatives, even in the business world. However, Smith rejects the principles of corporate social responsibility on the argument that benevolent impulses cannot be expected to prevail in the commercial arena. Instead of consciously trying to advance the social good, Smith's ideal manager will endeavour to personally live up to the standards enforced by an impartial spectator of his conduct, a theoretical entity reflecting the ethical requirements posed by the manager's social networks and stakeholder relationships. While this internalized onlooker expects a limited degree of benevolence, the overriding demand is for the manager to abide by the dictums of justice and prudence
|Keywords||Adam Smith business ethics social networks network ethics self-interest virtue corporate social responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce.Deirdre N. McCloskey - 2006 - University of Chicago Press.
[Book Review] Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. [REVIEW]Charles L. Griswold - 1999 - Ethics 111 (3):634-636.
Citations of this work BETA
Do Brokers Act in the Best Interests of Their Clients? New Evidence From Electronic Trading Systems.Annilee M. Game & Andros Gregoriou - 2016 - Business Ethics: A European Review 25 (2):187-197.
Will the Real A. Smith Please Stand Up!Matthias P. Hühn & Claus Dierksmeier - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
D. D. Raphael,The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy,and Leonidas Montes,Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of Some Central Components of His Thought:The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy;Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of Some Central Components of His Thought.Eric Schliesser - 2008 - Ethics 118 (3):569-575.
Adam Smith's Marketplace of Life, by James R. Otteson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Pp. 352. H/B £50.00, $70.00, P/B £19.95, $26.00. [REVIEW]Jack Weinstein - manuscript
Adam Smith and the Classics: The Classical Heritage in Adam Smith's Thought.Gloria Vivenza - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Das Adam Smith Problem - A Critical Realist Perspective.David Wilson & William Dixon - 2011 - Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2):251-272.
The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy.D. D. Raphael - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Marcus Aurelius, the Stoic Ethic, and Adam Smith.Harold B. Jones - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):89 - 96.
Adam Smith's Concept of the Social System.Edward W. Coker - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):139 - 142.
Adam Smith's Invisible Hand Argument.John D. Bishop - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):165 - 180.
Smith, Friedman, and Self-Interest in Ethical Society.Farhad Rassekh - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):659-674.
Added to index2009-06-04
Total downloads31 ( #164,722 of 2,164,535 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,995 of 2,164,535 )
How can I increase my downloads?