Action Theory in the Respective Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer and Chung-ying Cheng

Journal of Chinese Philosophy 48 (4):392-401 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article advances a dialogue between the philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer and the ontological hermeneutics of Chung-ying Cheng. This discussion draws into relief a question of whether or not these respective theories provide us with decision-making procedures for determining appropriate or right action in any given situation. In other words, we are inquiring into whether or not these respective hermeneutical theories incorporate forms of ethics. Following this line of questioning, we turn to Cheng’s philosophy of the Yijing and Gadamer’s analysis of Aristotle’s ethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cheng and Gadamer: Daoist Phenomenology.Jay Goulding - 2021 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 48 (4):368-382.
An Extension of Chung-ying Cheng’s Onto-Generative Hermeneutics.Hyun Höchsmann - 2021 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 48 (3):290-301.
Hans-Georg Gadamer (1900-2002).Andrzej Wiercinski - 2009 - Analecta Hermeneutica 1:356-358.
On Cheng Chung-Yings Bentiyong Onto-hermeneutics.James Garrison - 2012 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 7 (3):471-480.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
6 (#1,383,956)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references