A theory of the good and the right

Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What system of morals should rational people select as the best for society? Using a contemporary psychological theory of action and of motivation, Richard Brandt's Oxford lectures argue that the purpose of living should be to strive for the greatest good for the largest number of people. Brandt's discussions range from the concept of welfare to conflict between utilitarian moral codes and the dictates of self-interest.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,491

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice in health care: The contribution of Edmund Pellegrino.Robert M. Veatch - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (3):269-287.
Christian ethics: an introductory reader.Samuel Wells (ed.) - 2010 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
The stakeholder theory and the common good.Antonio Argandoña - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1093-1102.
Value theory.Thomas Hurka - 2006 - In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 357--379.
Morality and the good life.Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser (eds.) - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Morality, utilitarianism, and rights.Richard B. Brandt - 1992 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Carpenter and the Good.Rachel Barney - 2007 - In Douglas Cairns, Fritz-Gregor Herrmann & Terrence Penner (eds.), Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. University of Edinburgh. pp. 293-319.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
318 (#55,715)

6 months
23 (#97,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What makes pains unpleasant?David Bain - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):69-89.
Reasons and Theories of Sensory Affect.Murat Aydede & Matthew Fulkerson - 2019 - In David Bain, Michael Brady & Jennifer Corns (eds.), The Philosophy of Pain: Unpleasantness, Emotion, and Deviance. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 27-59.
Desire satisfactionism and hedonism.Chris Heathwood - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 128 (3):539-563.

View all 255 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references