Can Epistemic Contextualism Avoid the Regress Problem?

Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (3):317-328 (1998)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0038-4283
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1998.tb01758.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,178
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Reply to Cling's “The Epistemic Regress Problem”.William Roche - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (2):263-276.
Human Knowledge and the Infinite Progress of Reasoning.Peter Klein - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (1):1 - 17.
Internalist Foundationalism and the Problem of the Epistemic Regress.Jose L. Zalabardo - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):34 - 58.
Virtues, Social Roles, and Contextualism.Sarah Wright - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (1):95-114.
Presuppositional Epistemic Contextualism and the Problem of Known Presuppositions.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2012 - In Jessica Brown & Mikkel Gerken (eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions. Oxford University Press. pp. 104-119.
The Trouble with Infinitism.Andrew D. Cling - 2004 - Synthese 138 (1):101 - 123.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-15

Total downloads

53 ( #98,100 of 2,163,865 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #188,913 of 2,163,865 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums