Authors
Darren Bradley
University of Leeds
Abstract
Sometimes we learn what the world is like, and sometimes we learn where in the world we are. Are there any interesting differences between the two kinds of cases? The main aim of this article is to argue that learning where we are in the world brings into view the same kind of observation selection effects that operate when sampling from a population. I will first explain what observation selection effects are ( Section 1 ) and how they are relevant to learning where we are in the world ( Section 2 ). I will show how measurements in the Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics can be understood as learning where you are in the world via some observation selection effect ( Section 3 ). I will apply a similar argument to the Sleeping Beauty Problem ( Section 4 ) and explain what I take the significance of the analogy to be ( Section 5 ). Finally, I will defend the Restricted Principle of Indifference on which some of my arguments depend ( Section 6 )
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axq013
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Reference and Consciousness.J. Campbell - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Attitudes de Dicto and de Se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.

View all 49 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Wilson: Figure 1.Darren Bradley - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (3):683-693.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-02-22

Total views
1,014 ( #3,328 of 2,324,545 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
111 ( #4,485 of 2,324,545 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes