- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Does a prototypical argumentative schema exist? Text recall in 8 to 13 years olds
Argumentation 10 (2):163-174 (1996)
Abstract
120 students in grades 3 to 7 heard an argumentative text and were immediately submitted to a free recall task. The results show that before grade 7, the subjects did not view the text as argumentative. The discussion centers on the relevancy of a prototypical argumentative schema in accounting for these findingsMy notes
Similar books and articles
Does a prototypical argumentative schema exist? Text recall in 8 to 13 years olds.DominiqueGuy Brassart - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (2):163-174.
Retour(s) sur “Mir Rose” ou comment analyser et représenter le texte argumentatif (écrit)?Dominique Guy Brassart - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (3):299-332.
Insertion of connectives by 9- to 11-year-old children in an argumentative text.Sylvie Akiguet & Annie Piolat - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (2):253-270.
Improving argumentative writing skills: Effect of two types of aids. [REVIEW]Jean-Yves Roussey & Anne Gombert - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (2):283-300.
Deaf children's phonetic, visual, and dactylic coding in a grapheme recall task.John L. Locke & Virginia L. Locke - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1):142.
Argumentative Text as Rhetorical Structure: An Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory. [REVIEW]M. Azar - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):97-114.
Framed writing of argumentative monologues by sixteen-and seventeen-year-old students.Caroline Golder - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (3):343-358.
Rational Comprehension of Arguments in Theoretical Texts: A Program for an Argumentative-Linguistic Approach. [REVIEW]Lev G. Vassiliev - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (1):21-34.
Rule and similarity as prototype concepts.Edward E. Smith - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):34-35.
“Eat your Hamburger!”—“No, I don’t Want to!” Argumentation and Argumentative Development in the Context of Dinner Conversation in Twenty Swedish Families.Åsa Brumark - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):251-271.
Content and formulation writing argumentative texts in Paris.Bernard Schneuwly - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (2):213-226.
Negation, concession and refutation in counter-argumentative composition by pupils from 8 to 12 years old and adults.Dominique Guy Brassart - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (1):77-98.
The production and recognition of typological argumentative text markers.Caroline Golder & Pierre Coirier - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (2):271-282.
Modeling the Protagonist: The Strategic Use of Discourse Voices. [REVIEW]Paul Van den Hoven - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):475-487.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-31
Downloads
21 (#718,251)
6 months
9 (#290,637)
2014-03-31
Downloads
21 (#718,251)
6 months
9 (#290,637)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Argumentative Text as Rhetorical Structure: An Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory. [REVIEW]M. Azar - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):97-114.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo