Philosophy of Science 45 (1):96-109 (1978)

These days 'evolution' is usually defined as any change in the relative frequencies of genes in a population over time. This definition and some obvious alternatives are examined and rejected. The criticism of these definitions points out the need for a more holistic analysis of genotypes. I attempt such analysis by introducing measures of similarity of whole genotypes and then by grouping genotypes into similarity classes. Three sorts of measures of similarity are examined: a measure of structural similarity, a measure of functional similarity and one of relational or historical similarity. The functional approach is shown to be superior and a definition of 'evolution' is suggested
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/288781
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Sociobiology: The New Synthesis.Edward O. Wilson - 1975 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):577-584.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory.Robert N. Brandon - 1978 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (3):181.
Chance and Natural Selection.John Beatty - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):183-211.
Natural Selection Without Survival of the Fittest.C. Kenneth Waters - 1986 - Biology and Philosophy 1 (2):207-225.
Positive Heuristics in Evolutionary Biology.Richard E. Michod - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):1-36.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
55 ( #208,273 of 2,518,714 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,714 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes