Ethics briefing

Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):357-358 (2014)

Authors
Abstract
In February 2014, the Belgian Parliament passed legislation allowing euthanasia for terminally ill children of all ages by 86 votes to 44, with 12 abstentions. The Bill became law in early March after being signed by the King, making Belgium the first country in the world to abolish age restrictions for euthanasia. Previously, the youngest age at which euthanasia was permitted was 12 years old in The Netherlands.1Euthanasia was legalised in Belgium in 2002, and the new legislation introduces amendments to the law extending euthanasia to minors in certain circumstances. Euthanasia is now permissible for children of all ages where the child has a “terminal and incurable illness”, experiences “constant and unbearable physical suffering”, and death is expected to occur within a “brief period”. The child must be deemed capable of making the decision, and have the agreement of their parents.Belgian law sets no timetable for euthanasia from the point at which the patient first expresses a wish to die. As with adults seeking euthanasia, any request must be made in writing. A physician and “outsider” brought in to give a second opinion must agree upon the diagnosis and prognosis, and a paediatric psychiatrist or psychologist must certify in writing that the child possesses “the capacity of discernment”. Following this, the child's physician must meet with the parents to inform them of the outcome of the consultation and ensure they are in agreement with the child's request. The child and the family must receive psychological care and support if so desired.The move provoked heated debate and divided the medical, legal and political professions in Belgium. A group of 160 of the country's paediatricians opposed a change in the law, citing concerns about the largely subjective assessment of the “capacity of discernment”, and drawing attention to advances in …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2014-102152
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,283
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Child Euthanasia: Should We Just Not Talk About It?Luc Bovens - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (8):630-634.
Facing Requests for Euthanasia: A Clinical Practice Guideline.C. Gastmans - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):212-217.
How to Deal with Euthanasia Requests: A Palliative Filter Procedure.Paul Schotsmans & Chris Gastmans - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (4):420.
Law-Making, Ethics and Hastiness.Tom Meulenbergs & Paul Schotsmans - 2002 - Ethical Perspectives 9 (2):86-95.
Palliative Care and Euthanasia.Bert Broeckaert & Rien Janssens - 2002 - Ethical Perspectives 9 (2):156-175.
Belgian Euthanasia Law: A Critical Analysis.R. Cohen-Almagor - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):436-439.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
14 ( #587,667 of 2,270,961 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #832,952 of 2,270,961 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature