Enhancing Evolution and Enhancing Evolution

Bioethics 24 (8):395-402 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT It has been claimed in several places that the new genetic technologies allow humanity to achieve in a generation or two what might take natural selection hundreds of millennia in respect of the elimination of certain diseases and an increase in traits such as intelligence. More radically, it has been suggested that those same technologies could be used to instil characteristics that we might reasonably expect never to appear due to natural selection alone. John Harris, a proponent of this genomic optimism, claims in his book Enhancing Evolution that we not only have it in our power to enhance evolution, but that we also have a duty to do so. In this paper, I claim that Harris' hand is strong but that he overplays it nevertheless. He is correct to dismiss the arguments of the anti‐enhancement lobby and correct to say that enhancement is permissible; but ‘good’ is different from ‘permissible’ and his argument for the goodness of enhancement is less convincing. Moreover, he is simply wrong to claim that it generates a duty to enhance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Iain Brassington
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

The Topsy-Turvy Cloning Law.Iain Brassington & Stuart Oultram - 2011 - Monash Bioethics Review 29 (3):1-18.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references