How indefinites choose their scope

Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):1-55 (2011)
Abstract
The paper proposes a novel solution to the problem of scope posed by natural language indefinites that captures both the difference in scopal freedom between indefinites and bona fide quantifiers and the syntactic sensitivity that the scope of indefinites does nevertheless exhibit. Following the main insight of choice functional approaches, we connect the special scopal properties of indefinites to the fact that their semantics can be stated in terms of choosing a suitable witness. This is in contrast to bona fide quantifiers, the semantics of which crucially involves relations between sets of entities. We provide empirical arguments that this insight should not be captured by adding choice/Skolem functions to classical first-order logic, but in a semantics that follows Independence-Friendly Logic, in which scopal relations involving existentials are part of the recursive definition of truth and satisfaction. These scopal relations are resolved automatically as part of the interpretation of existentials. Additional support for this approach is provided by dependent indefinites, a cross-linguistically common class of special indefinites that can be straightforwardly analyzed in our semantic framework
Keywords Exceptional scope  (Dependent) indefinites  Choice/Skolem functions  Plural logic  Independence-friendly logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10988-011-9092-7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,719
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Restrictions on Quantifier Domains.Kai von Fintel - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 1978 - Syntax and Semantics (New York Academic Press) 9:315-332.
The Principles of Mathematics Revisited.Jaakko Hintikka - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Why Indefinites Can Escape Scope Islands.Edgar Onea - 2015 - Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (3):237-267.
Dependent Indefinites: The View From Sign Language.Kuhn Jeremy - 2017 - Journal of Semantics 34 (3):407-446.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2011-10-16

Total downloads
45 ( #119,727 of 2,197,266 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #298,963 of 2,197,266 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature