Introspection and empathy

Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 7 (1):25-30 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Titchener is credited to be the man who coined the term “empathy” as a translation of the German “Einfühlung”. With the raise of modern neuroscience empathy has become a key concept, and historical reconstructions give Titchener’s contribution a distinct place in the history of the development of our knowledge about empathy. What is implicitly conveyed is that the neurophysiological processes studied nowadays refer to the same entity that was discussed in the philosophical and psychological literature of late Nineteen and early Twentieth Century. This paper shows that what we have instead is the history of a term, not that of a concept. In the case of Titchener, he uses the term empathy to refer to at least three differentiable phenomena. In the first occurrence, in a lecture at the University of Illinois, he denominates empathy the “fact” that when we have a “visual image” of a given character, we contemporarily experience a kinesthetic activation in the corresponding muscles: “Not only do I see gravity and modesty and pride and courtesy and stateliness, but I feel or act them in the mind’s muscles”. In a note subsequently added to the same lecture, Titchener calls empathy the logical and aesthetic act of immediately grasping the general sense of a visual schema or of a musical composition. In a third occurrence empathy is used in the interpersonal context of the experimental setting. Here empathy refers to the “full sympathy” of the experimenter with his experimental subject: “he must think […] as they think, understand as they understand, speak in their language”. No further analysis of this phenomenon is given, it is taken for granted. Finally, Titchener returns to empathy and kinesthesis by talking of “motor empathy” in case of “feelings of relation”. Here he links together: viewing a lecturer often using in his talk the monosyllable “but”, having a picture in mind representing this “feeling of but”, and experiencing the corresponding kinesthetic activation, sometimes together with “a strong affective colouring”.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Empathy For?Joel Smith - 2017 - Synthese 194 (3).
Empathy Training from a Phenomenological Perspective.Magnus Englander - 2014 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 45 (1):5-26.
Empathy and Its Role in Morality.Meghan Masto - 2015 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):74-96.
The Nature of Empathy.Jakob Eklund - 2013 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 20 (1):28-38.
Similarity versus familiarity: When empathy becomes selfish.Elias L. Khalil - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):41-41.
Empathy and transformative experience without the first person point of view.Herman Cappelen & Josh Dever - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (3):315-336.
Depth psychology, death and the hermeneutic of empathy.George B. Hogenson - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (1):67-90.


Added to PP

173 (#113,529)

6 months
30 (#107,264)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Feelings.[author unknown] - 2011
An Introduction to Psychology.Mary Whiton Calkins - 1902 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 53:675-676.
The term `feeling'.Margaret Floy Washburn - 1906 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 3 (3):62-63.

View all 7 references / Add more references