Is there a puzzle about how authentic dasein can act?: A critique of Dreyfus and Rubin on being and time, division II

Abstract
Dreyfus and Rubin's commentary on Division II of Being and Time raises three closely related puzzles about the possibility of authenticity: how could Dasein ever choose to become authentic, how could authentic Dasein ever choose to take up any particular possibility, and how could anything matter to authentic Dasein? They argue that Heidegger has a convincing answer to the first two puzzles, but they find his answer to the third "indirect and not totally convincing". I argue that they should find Heidegger's answer to the third puzzle far worse than "not totally convincing", given their interpretation of his account of anxiety, and that the answers they claim he has in response to the first two puzzles are not supported by the text. I then show that the puzzles arise from distortions in Dreyfus and Rubin's interpretation of Heidegger's account of anxiety. The puzzles dissolve once the distortions are identified
Keywords Heideggger  Authenticity  Dreyfus and Rubin
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201740500320104
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
You Can't Get Something for Nothing: Kierkegaard and Heidegger on How Not to Overcome Nihilism.Hubert L. Dreyfus & Jane Rubin - 1987 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (1 & 2):33 – 75.
On Being Social: A Reply to Olafson.Taylor Carman - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):203 – 223.
Overturning Cartesianism and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion: Rethinking Dreyfus on Heidegger.Leslie MacAvoy - 2001 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):455 – 480.
Heidegger's Theory of Space: A Critique of Dreyfus.Yoko Arisaka - 1995 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):455 – 467.
Heidegger la Wittgenstein or 'Coping' with Professor Dreyfus.Frederick A. Olafson - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):45 – 64.
Authenticity in Heidegger: A Response to Dreyfus.Elizabeth Ewing - 1995 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):469 – 487.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
75 ( #72,000 of 2,191,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #95,373 of 2,191,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature