John Harris' Argument for a Duty to Research

Bioethics 21 (3):160-168 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT John Harris suggests that participation in or support for research, particularly medical research, is a moral duty. One kind of defence of this position rests on an appeal to the past, and produces two arguments. The first of these arguments is that it is unfair to accept the benefits of research without contributing something back in the form of support for, or participation in, research. A second argument is that we have a social duty to maintain those practices and institutions that sustain us, such as those which contribute to medical knowledge. This argument is related to the first, but it does not rely so heavily on fairness. Another kind of defence of the duty to research rests on an appeal to the future benefits of research: research is an effective way to discharge a duty to rescue others from serious illness or death, therefore we have a duty to research. I suggest that all three of Harris' lines fail to provide a compelling duty to research and spell out why. Moreover, not only do the lines of argument fail in their own terms: in combination, they turn out to be antagonistic to the very position that Harris wants to defend. While it is not my intention here to deny that there might be a duty to research, I claim that Harris' argument for the existence of such a duty is not the best way to establish it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defending the duty to research?Iain Brassington - 2010 - Bioethics 25 (1):21-26.
The case for a duty to research: not yet proven.Iain Brassington - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):329-330.
A duty to participate in research: Does social context matter?Inmaculada de Melo-Mart - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):28 – 36.
Rescuing the Duty to Rescue.Tina Rulli & Joseph Millum - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics:1-5.
Can I Have a Duty to Believe in God?Jonathan Harrison - 1957 - Philosophy 32 (122):241 - 252.
Is There a Duty to Die?John Hardwig - 1997 - Hastings Center Report 27 (2):34-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
20 (#788,683)

6 months
4 (#854,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Iain Brassington
University of Manchester

References found in this work

Scientific research is a moral duty.J. Harris - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):242-248.

Add more references