Logos and Episteme 4 (3):293-304 (2013)

William Brant
University of Maryland University College
ABSTRACT: In this essay I provide one methodology that yields the level of analysis of an alleged knowledge-claim under investigation via its relations to varying gradations of scepticism. Each proposed knowledge-claim possesses a specified relationship with: (i) a globally sceptical argument; (ii) the least sceptical but successful argument that casts it into doubt; and (iii) the most sceptical yet unsuccessful argument, which is conceivably hypothesized to repudiate it but fails to do so. Yielding this specified set of relations, by means of proceeding from global scepticism to (ii) and (iii), increases the chances of identifying the highest evaluative relevancy of the levels of analysis and observation of an alleged knowledge-claim. I argue that the failure to analyse and derive a difference between (i) and (ii) with respect to an alleged knowledge-claim signifies that the claim is grounded within the theoretical framework itself, that the claim lacks specification with regard to content that is analysable via that framework, and the claim is dubious insofar as alternative theoretic frameworks may present greater relevancy to levels of observation. KEYWORDS: knowledge, scepticism, perception, level of observation, magnification level, methodological scepticism
Keywords skeptcism  knowledge  perception  perceptual skepticism  level of observation  magnification  observation  magnification level  methodological skepticism  analysis  Global skepticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 2069-0533
DOI 10.5840/logos-episteme20134314
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Impossibility of Local Skepticism.Stephen Maitzen - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):453-464.
A Refutation of Global Scepticism.Ken Gemes - 2009 - Analysis 69 (2):218-219.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Content Skepticism.William S. Larkin - 2000 - Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (1):33-43.
Replies to Commentators. [REVIEW]Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):468-491.
Review: Replies to Commentators. [REVIEW]Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):468 - 491.
Précis of The Appearance of Ignorance: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 2.Keith DeRose - 2019 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 9 (3):321-323.


Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #167,582 of 60,800 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #50,740 of 60,800 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes