Analysis 63 (1):23–31 (2003)

Authors
Branden Fitelson
Northeastern University
Darren Bradley
University of Leeds
Abstract
We give an analysis of the Monty Hall problem purely in terms of confirmation, without making any lottery assumptions about priors. Along the way, we show the Monty Hall problem is structurally identical to the Doomsday Argument.
Keywords Doomsday Argument  Monty Hall  Confirmation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0003-2638.2003.00389.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness.Joseph Levine - 2001 - Oxford University Press USA.
Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility?Stephen Yablo - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1):1-42.
Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness.Alex Byrne - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (4):594-597.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Four Problems About Self-Locating Belief.D. Bradley - 2012 - Philosophical Review 121 (2):149-177.
On Bertrand's Paradox.Sorin Bangu - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):30-35.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
1,011 ( #3,334 of 2,324,058 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
77 ( #7,110 of 2,324,058 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes