Minimal marriage: What political liberalism implies for marriage law

Ethics 120 (2):302-337 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent defenses of same-sex marriage and polygamy have invoked the liberal doctrines of neutrality and public reason. Such reasoning is generally sound but does not go far enough. This paper traces the full implications of political liberalism for marriage. I argue that the constraints of public reason, applied to marriage law, entail ‘minimal marriage’, the most extensive set of state-determined restrictions on marriage compatible with political liberalism. Minimal marriage sets no principled restrictions on the sex or number of spouses and the nature and purpose of their caring relationships, nor on which marital rights are exchanged, and whether they are exchanged reciprocally or asymmetrically. Minimal marriage supports adult care networks, urban tribes, friendships, and other forms of relationships as well as ‘traditional’ marriages. I provide a publically justifiable rationale for a legal framework supporting non-dependent caring relationships between adults. The argument is that caring relationships are primary goods, and that liberal justice accordingly requires legal frameworks supporting caring relationships. Minimal marriage is one such framework.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-12

Downloads
844 (#9,504)

6 months
16 (#64,326)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Brake
Rice University

Citations of this work

Coercion.Scott Anderson - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Public justification.Kevin Vallier - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Is the Family Uniquely Valuable?Anca Gheaus - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):120-131.
Public justification.Fred D'Agostino - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references