Moral Philosophy and Politics 1 (2):227-247 (2014)

Abstract
Three perspectives on international trade are present in current debates. From the first perspective, trade is regarded as a set of individual transactions among consenting parties and considerations of fairness and justice barely feature, if at all. The second perspective underlines the importance of background structures for trade, maintained by states, which gives rise considerations of fairness and justice. One prominent version of this perspective, for example as defended by Aaron James, views all trading states as having in principle equal claims to the gains from trade. A third perspective puts the focus on exploitation. In this special issue, Mathias Risse and Gabriel Wollner claim that the first perspective should be abandoned and that the type of approach that is instantiated by James fails. This article does not follow them in dismissing the second perspective in its entirety. It suggests that there is a different version of this perspective that is defensible and develops key elements of that version. In a second step, the article seeks to show that, even if there were no plausible account of fairly dividing gains from trade among states, fairness in trade would still generate demanding normative requirements – that can be and should be integrated into a theory of global justice.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/mopp-2014-0006
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,968
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Being Realistic About International Trade Justice.Christian Neuhäuser - 2018 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 5 (2):181-204.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Autarky as a Moral Baseline.Kristi A. Olson - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):264-285.
Justice and International Trade.Helena Bres - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (10):570-579.
International Trade, Fairness, and Labour Migration.Alexia Herwig & Sylvie Loriaux - 2014 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 1 (2):289-313.
Justice and Insider Trading.Richard L. Lippke - 1993 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (2):215-226.
A Theory of Fairness in Trade.Aaron James - 2014 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 1 (2):177-200.
Fair Trade: What Does It Mean and Why Does It Matter?David Miller - forthcoming - New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy.
Overlapped Free Trade Areas and the Agreements of Multilateral Trade.Xin-Xuan Cheng & Yu-ke Zhang - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:118-124.
On Fairness and Claims.Patrick Tomlin - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (2):200-213.
Fair Trade, Formal Equality, and Preferential Treatment.James Christensen - 2015 - Social Theory and Practice 41 (3):505-526.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-12

Total views
8 ( #961,187 of 2,433,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #217,362 of 2,433,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes