Ramsification and glymour’s counterexample

Analysis 57 (3):167–169 (1997)
Authors
David Braddon-Mitchell
University of Sydney
Robert Nola
University of Auckland
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00070
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,309
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Theory-Dependence, Warranted Reference, and the Epistemic Dimensions of Realism.Frederick Kroon - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (2):173-191.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the No-Counterexample Interpretation.Ulrich Kohlenbach - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1491-1511.
Truth, Ramsification, and the Pluralist's Revenge.Cory D. Wright - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):265-283.
Glymour on Confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (2):292-307.
Glymour on Evidential Relevance.David Christensen - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):471-481.
Glymour on Deoccamization and the Epistemology of Geometry.Jane Duran - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (1):127-134.
Empirical Adequacy and Ramsification.Jeffrey Ketland - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):287-300.
The Canberra Plan.David Braddon-Mitchell & Robert Nola (eds.) - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Explanatory Asymmetries.James Woodward - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (3):421-442.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
111 ( #58,610 of 2,309,301 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,484 of 2,309,301 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature