The case for a duty to research: not yet proven

Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):329-330 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this commentary on ‘Why participating in scientific research is a moral duty’, I take issue with a number of Stjernschantz Forsberg et al's claims. Though abiding by the terms of a contract might be obligatory, this won't show that those terms themselves indicate a duty—even allowing that there's a contract to begin with. Meanwhile, though we might have reasons to participate, not all reasons are moral reasons, and the paper does not establish that the reasons here are moral in character



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Forgiveness: Moral Prerogative or Religious Duty?Paul Lauritzen - 1987 - Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (2):141-154.
How Reasons Determine Moral Requirements.Thomas Schmidt - 2023 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 18. Oxford University Press. pp. 97-115.


Added to PP

22 (#733,560)

6 months
7 (#491,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Iain Brassington
University of Manchester

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references