The Importance of Personal Relationships in Kantian Moral Theory: A Reply to Care Ethics

Hypatia 25 (1):121-139 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Care ethicists have long insisted that Kantian moral theory fails to capture the partiality that ought to be present in our personal relationships. In her most recent book, Virginia Held claims that, unlike impartial moral theories, care ethics guides us in how we should act toward friends and family. Because these actions are performed out of care, they have moral value for a care ethicist. The same actions, Held claims, would not have moral worth for a Kantian because of the requirement of impartiality. Although Kantian moral theory is an impartial theory, I argue that the categorical imperative in the Formulation of Humanity as an End and the duty of respect require that we give special treatment to friends and family because of their relationships with us. Therefore, this treatment does have moral value for a Kantian.


Added to PP

5,847 (#636)

6 months
544 (#887)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marilea Bramer
Metropolitan State University

References found in this work

Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas E. Hill & Arnulf Zweig.
The metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 1797/1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mary J. Gregor.
The ethics of care: personal, political, and global.Virginia Held - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Lectures on ethics.Immanuel Kant - 1930 - London,: Methuen & co.. Edited by Louis Infield.

View all 32 references / Add more references