The non-triviality of dialectical set theory

In Graham Priest, Richard Routley & Jean Norman (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent. Philosophia Verlag. pp. 437--470 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,400

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Depth relevance of some paraconsistent logics.Ross T. Brady - 1984 - Studia Logica 43 (1-2):63 - 73.
Semantic closure, descriptions and non-triviality.Graham Priest - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (6):549--558.
Triviality arguments against functionalism.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (2):273 - 295.
Issues in commonsense set theory.Mujdat Pakkan & Varol Akman - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence Review 8:279-308.
Is any set theory true?Joseph S. Ullian - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (3):271-279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-18

Downloads
5 (#1,170,399)

6 months
2 (#300,644)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Paraconsistent logic.Graham Priest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dialetheism.Francesco Berto, Graham Priest & Zach Weber - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2018 (2018).
Transfinite cardinals in paraconsistent set theory.Zach Weber - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):269-293.
Absolute Contradiction, Dialetheism, and Revenge.Francesco Berto - 2014 - Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):193-207.

View all 44 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references