Why Not Both? Interaction and the Individual in Enactivism

Constructivist Foundations 18 (3):380-382 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Beyond Individual-Centred 4E Cognition: Systems Biology and Sympoiesis” by Mads Julian Dengsø & Michael David Kirchhoff. Abstract: I provide two reasons for thinking the conclusion drawn from the argument’s premises is too strong. Briefly, (a) the benefits of having consistent commitments between enactivism and developmental systems theory are only clear when treating both as philosophies of nature rather than empirical research programs, and (b) the target article demonstrates that enactivism is capable of explanatory pluralism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,020

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Structural Coupling meet Sympoiesis?Jorge Soto-Andrade - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (3):371-373.
Cognitive Agency Without Individuality.Amanda Corris - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (3):370-371.
Cognition Is Both Relational and Centered in Individuals.Tim Elmo Feiten - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (3):365-367.
Is Sympoiesis Compatible with Phenomenology?Carl B. Sachs - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (3):376-378.
Individuals for Anti-Individualists.John Sutton - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (3):374-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-29

Downloads
18 (#1,130,804)

6 months
8 (#635,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references