Utilitas 19 (2):220-242 (2007)
Principle monists believe that our moral duties, such as fidelity and non-maleficence, can be justified in terms of one basic moral principle. Principle pluralists disagree, some suggesting that only an excessive taste for simplicity or a desire to mimic natural science could lead one to endorse monism. In Ideal Code, Real World (Oxford, 2000), Brad Hooker defends a monist theory, employing the method of reflective equilibrium to unify the moral duties under a version of rule consequentialism. Hooker's arguments have drawn powerful criticisms from pluralists such as Alan Thomas, Phillip Montague and Philip Stratton-Lake. Against these critics, I argue that Hooker's monism enjoys certain practical advantages associated with the simplicity of a single basic principle. These advantages are often overlooked because they appear primarily in cases of second-order deliberation, in which one must decide whether our basic moral duties support a certain derivative duty. I argue that these advantages of monism over pluralism are analogous to the advantages that generalists claim over moral particularism. Because pluralists are generalists, I conclude that they are in an awkward dialectical position to dismiss Hooker's monism for the reasons they usually offer
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Another Particularism: Reasons, Status and Defaults. [REVIEW]Alan Thomas - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):151-167.
Similar books and articles
A Modified Rawlsian Theory of Social Justice: “Justice as Fair Rights”.Rodney G. Peffer - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:593-608.
Disparate Goods and Rawls' Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment.Allan Gibbard - 1979 - Theory and Decision 11 (3):267.
Aristotle on the Principle of Non-Contradiction.S. Marc Cohen - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):359-370.
Aristotle's Investigation of a Basic Logical Principle: Which Science Investigates the Principle of Non-Contradiction?Alan Code - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):341 - 357.
Conservatism, Basic Beliefs, and the Diachronic and Social Nature of Epistemic Justification.Jeremy Koons - 2005 - Episteme 2 (3):203-218.
The Liberty Principle and Universal Health Care.Benjamin Sachs - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):pp. 149-172.
Love as the Basic Moral Principle in Paul Ramsey's Ethics.Charles E. Harris Jr - 1976 - Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (2):239 - 258.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads72 ( #73,250 of 2,171,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,902 of 2,171,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?