Journal of Business Ethics 7 (9):703 - 710 (1988)

Abstract
The prevailing pedagogical approach in business ethics generally underestimates or even ignores the powerful influences of situational factors on ethical analysis and decision-making. This is due largely to the predominance of philosophy-oriented teaching materials. Social psychology offers relevant concepts and experiments that can broaden pedagogy to help students understand more fully the influence of situational contexts and role expectations in ethical analysis. Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment is used to illustrate the relevance of social psychology experiments for business ethics instruction.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00382981
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Business Ethics: Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality.W. Michael Hoffman, Robert Frederick & Mark S. Schwartz - 1995 - Mcgraw-Hill Humanities, Social Sciences & World Languages.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Individual Responsibility Within Organizational Contexts.Robert F. Card - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 62 (4):397-405.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
152 ( #75,896 of 2,498,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #118,239 of 2,498,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes