A Methodological Assessment of Multiple Utility Frameworks

Economics and Philosophy 5 (2):189-208 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the fundamental components of the concept of economic rationality is that preference orderings are “complete,” i.e., that all alternative actions an economic agent can take are comparable. The idea that all actions can be ranked may be called the single utility assumption. The attractiveness of this assumption is considerable. It would be hard to fathom what choice among alternatives means if the available alternatives cannot be ranked by the chooser in some way. In addition, the efficiency criterion makes sense only if one can infer that an individual's choice reflects the best, in expected welfare terms, among all choices that individual could have made. The possibility that a rearrangement of resources could make someone “better off” without making others “worse off” can be understood only if the post-rearrangement world is comparable with the pre-rearrange-ment world.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Futility of Multiple Utility.Timothy J. Brennan - 1993 - Economics and Philosophy 9 (1):155-164.
Revealed Preference and Expected Utility.Stephen A. Clark - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):159-174.
Multidimensional welfare aggregation.Christian List - 2004 - Public Choice 119:119-142.
The Utility of Multiple Utility: A Comment on Brennan.Mark A. Lutz - 1993 - Economics and Philosophy 9 (1):145-154.
Freedom and choice in economics.Adolfo García de la Sienra - 2016 - Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (3):316-332.
Nozick, Ramsey, and symbolic utility.Wesley Cooper - 2008 - Utilitas 20 (3):301-322.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
69 (#213,777)

6 months
14 (#114,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Challenging the Egoistic Paradigm.Norman E. Bowie - 1991 - Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1):1-21.
Philosophy of economics.Daniel M. Hausman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Eclipse of Value-Free Economics. The concept of multiple self versus homo economicus.Aleksander Ostapiuk - 2020 - Wrocław, Polska: Publishing House of Wroclaw University of Economics and Business.
A Critique of Instrumental Reason in Economics.Hamish Stewart - 1995 - Economics and Philosophy 11 (1):57.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Principia ethica.George Edward Moore - 1903 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Thomas Baldwin.
Ethics and the limits of philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1985 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
Trust and antitrust.Annette Baier - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):231-260.

View all 36 references / Add more references