Examining Tobacco Control Strategies and Aims Through a Social Justice Lens: An Application of Sen's Capability Approach
Public Health Ethics 4 (2):149-159 (2011)
Although the effectiveness of some tobacco programs and policies has been clearly demonstrated in reducing the overall population smoking prevalence, the health benefits are not equally distributed across all socio-economic classes; a situation that clearly runs against the equalitarian ethos of most modern states. In this article, we evaluate the benefits of using Sen’s Capability Approach as a theory of social justice to guide public health program and policy development in a way that would prevent the further increase of inequalities in health outcomes. Starting from four consensual goals of tobacco control practice (i.e. that individuals live a smoke-free life, that smokers quit smoking, that non-smokers are protected from exposure to second-hand smoke and that smoking cessation support is accessible) we found that besides the standard interventions (e.g. education on the harms of smoking, policies to reduce exposure to SHS) an iniquity-proof tobacco control program needs also to address the lack of options of underprivileged people in affordable smoke-free settings and in leisure activities. We conclude that an ethical tobacco prevention program needs to address the broader social determinants of health such as the socio-economic policies that put a strain on people’s capacity to shun or quit smoking
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lifestyle Vaccines and Public Health: Exploring Policy Options for a Vaccine to Stop Smoking.Anna Wolters, Guido de Wert, Onno C. P. Van Schayck & Klasien Horstman - 2016 - Public Health Ethics 9 (2):183-197.
Similar books and articles
Getting Smoke Off the Screen.Robbin Derry & Sachin Waikar - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:499-499.
The Ethics of Smoking Policies.Judy C. Nixon & Judy F. West - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (6):409 - 414.
Too Poor To Treat? The Complex Ethics of Cost-Effective Tobacco Policy in the Developing World.A. Bitton & N. Eyal - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):109-120.
The Ethical and Economic Implications of Smoking in Enclosed Public Facilities: A Resolution of Conflicting Rights. [REVIEW]S. Andrew Ostapski, L. Wayne Plumly & J. L. Love - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4):377-384.
Smoking Bans and Persons with Schizophrenia: A Straightforward Use of the Harm Principle?D. S. Silva - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):143-148.
Healthy Investments in Investing in Health.Derek Yach - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (3):191 - 198.
Is Prevention Better Than Cure? A Re-Evaluation of the Potential Use of Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine in Children.K. McMahon-Parkes - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):121-128.
Can It Be Ethical to Apply Limited Resources in Low-Income Countries to Ineffective, Low-Reach Smoking Cessation Strategies? A Reply to Bitton and Eyal.S. Chapman & R. Mackenzie - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (1):29-37.
The Smoking Penalty: Distributive Justice or Smokism? [REVIEW]Martin J. Lecker - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):47 - 64.
Social Choice and Individual Capabilities.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):169-192.
Added to index2011-06-24
Total downloads23 ( #221,085 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #45,332 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?