Google, Human Rights, and Moral Compromise

Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):453-478 (2009)
International business faces a host of difficult moral conflicts. It is tempting to think that these conflicts can be morally resolved if we gained full knowledge of the situations, were rational enough, and were sufficiently objective. This paper explores the view that there are situations in which people in business must confront the possibility that they must compromise some of their important principles or values in order to protect other ones. One particularly interesting case that captures this kind of situation is that of Google and its operations in China. In this paper, I examine the situation Google faces as part of the larger issue of moral compromise and integrity in business. Though I look at Google, this paper is just as much about the underlying or background views Google faces that are at work in business ethics. In the process, I argue the following: First, the framework Google has used to respond to criticisms of its actions does not successfully or obviously address the important ethical issues it faces. Second, an alternative ethical account can be presented that better addresses these ethical and human rights questions. However, this different framework brings the issue of moral compromise to the fore. This is an approach filled with dangers, particularly since it is widely held that one ought never to compromise one’s moral principles. Nevertheless, I wish to propose that there may be a place for moral compromise in business under certain conditions, which I attempt to specify.
Keywords censorship  China  Google  human rights  moral compromise
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9783-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,812
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands.Michael Walzer - 1973 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (2):160-180.
Morality and Conflict.Stuart Hampshire - 1983 - Harvard University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Post-Westphalia and Its Discontents.Michael A. Santoro - 2010 - Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):285-297.
Corporate Responsibilities in Internet-Enabled Social Networks.Stephen Chen - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S4):523 - 536.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Human Rights and Human Well-Being.William Talbott - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Integrity and Compromise in Nursing Ethics.Gerald R. Winslow - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):307-323.
Why No Compromise is Possible.Torbjörn Tännsjö - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):330–343.
Moral Compromise.David Archard - 2012 - Philosophy 87 (3):403-420.
Human Rights and Concept of Person.Barbara de Mori - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):159-169.
History, Human Rights, and Globalization.Sumner B. Twiss - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (1):39-70.
The Structure of Basic Human Rights.George E. Panichas - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (3):343 - 375.
In Defense of Moral Rights.Barbara De Mori - 2001 - Etica E Politica 3 (1).
Subsidized Abortion: Moral Rights and Moral Compromise.George Sher - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (4):361-372.
Human Rights and Bioethics.Y. M. Barilan & M. Brusa - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):379-383.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
128 ( #48,210 of 2,293,708 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #107,654 of 2,293,708 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature