Improving Australia’s ethical review processes — slow and steady wins the race

Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S58-S62 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this response, the Australian Health Ethics Committee (AHEC) indicates that it shares, and has strategies in place to address, the majority of the concerns identified by Susan Dodds. AHEC believes it is too early to assess the full impact of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans (1999) or to call for a major review of the ethics committee process. While some Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) are over-stretched, the system is not on the verge of collapse.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some cross-cultural evidence on ethical reasoning.Judy Tsui & Carolyn Windsor - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (2):143 - 150.
A partnership model of corporate ethics.Greg Wood - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 40 (1):61 - 73.
Organizational Ethics: A Practical Approach.Craig E. Johnson - 2011 - Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-14

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references