Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (3):249-263 (2006)

Authors
Samantha Brennan
University of Guelph
Abstract
Can all goods or bads be broken down into smaller and smaller pieces? Can all goods or bads be added together with some other good or bad to get a larger amount? Further, how does moral significance track the disaggregation and the aggregation of moral goods and bads? In Part 1, I examine the limits placed on aggregation by moderate deontological moral theories. This paper focuses in particular on the work of Judith Thomson and T.M. Scanlon as well as on some of my own past work on the question of aggregation in the context of overriding rights. In Part 2, I examine consequentialist criticism that harms and benefits can be broken down into smaller pieces than the deontological theory allows and the argument that the moderate deontological view is too permissive since it allows aggregation of benefits within a single person's life. In Part 3 I suggest how a moderate deontological moral theory might respond to the criticisms. I cast my answer in terms of the existence of lumpy goods and bads. I argue that consequentialist critics of deontology are wrong to insist that all goods and bads can be disaggregated and aggregated at will. Instead, I offer the suggestion that most, or many, goods and bads come in morally significant lumps. That said, it will not always be obvious what those lumps are. Determining the texture of moral value is a substantive project in normative ethics. All I have hoped to do in this paper is suggest that two standard positions on how to group moral value are mistaken and give hope that we need not adopt one of the two. Part 4 of the paper responds to an objection and sets the stage for further work in value theory
Keywords Philosophy   Political Philosophy   Ontology   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-006-9019-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,636
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Realm of Rights.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1990 - Harvard University Press.
Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives.Alastair Norcross - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (2):135-167.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought.Angelika Kratzer - 1989 - Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (5):607 - 653.
Statues and Lumps: A Strange Coincidence?Mark Moyer - 2006 - Synthese 148 (2):401-423.
Commentary on "Lumps and Bumps&Quot.Kathleen Wallace - 1996 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 3 (1):17-20.
Commentary on "Lumps and Bumps&Quot.Katherine Arens - 1996 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 3 (1):15-16.
Coincidence as Overlap.L. Paul - 2006 - Noûs 40 (4):623–659.
Feminist Moral Philosophy.Samantha Brennan (ed.) - 2003 - University of Calgary Press.
Moderate Deontology and Moral Gaps.Samantha Brennan - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):23-43.
Constituted Simples?Jens Johansson - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (1):87-89.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
58 ( #188,235 of 2,462,244 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,178 of 2,462,244 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes