Proslogion II and III, A Third Interpretation of Anselm’s Argument

Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 23:314-317 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

05540739

DOI

10.5840/philstudies19742317

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today.Ian Logan - 2008 - Ashgate. Edited by Anselm.
Anselm's ontological argument: Whole, unified, and complete.Clint Ilsley Barrett - unknown
Anselm's neglected argument.Brian Leftow - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
The Modal Unity of Anselm’s Proslogion.Gary Mar - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):50-67.
Anselm and the ontological argument.Graham Oppy - 2011 - In Jeff Jordan (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: The Key Thinkers. London: Continuum. pp. 22-43.
Anselm's "Proslogion" Argument: A Metaphysics of Creation.Floyd Edwin Wike - 1980 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
The Ontological Argument.Stephen Makin - 1988 - Philosophy 63 (243):83 - 91.
Proslogion II and III. [REVIEW]E. M. W. - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (1):135-136.
Offices and God.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1990 - Sophia 29 (3):29-34.
Anselm and the Two-Argument Hypothesis.J. Brenton Stearns - 1970 - The Monist 54 (2):221-233.
The “Logic” of Faith Seeking Understanding: A Propaedeutic for Anselm's Proslogion.Matthew D. Walz - 2010 - Dionysius 28.
Is Existence a Predicate in Anselm's Argument?: DAVID M. LOCHHEAD.David M. Lochhead - 1966 - Religious Studies 2 (1):121-127.
The non-Christian influence on Anselm’s Proslogion argument.Nancy Kendrick - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):73-89.
Proslogion II and III: A Third Interpretation of Anselm’s Argument.Richard R. La Croix - 1972 - Philosophical Review 84 (1):135-140.
A Careful Reading of St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument.Clint I. Barrett - 2011 - Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):217-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-20

Downloads
8 (#1,283,306)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bob Brecher
University of Brighton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references