Journal of Social Philosophy 30 (2):260–275 (1999)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Should feminist ethical theories include rights as a component? There is a tension between feminist politics and the endorsement of the language of “women’s rights,” and feminist ethics and its critique of rights.1 In this paper I begin the project of reconciling moral theories that include rights as a component with feminist criticisms of rights. There are two parts to this project. First, I must respond to the criticisms feminists have made against rights theories in order to show that it is possible for a moral theory that includes rights to be a feminist moral theory. Answering these criticisms is necessary if I am to establish that moral theories that include rights are among the candidate theories from which feminists might choose. Second, I must develop a feminist moral theory that encompasses rights, and argue for its superiority to other sorts of moral theories in order to show that a moral theory that encompasses rights is a plausible feminist moral theory. Going beyond responding to criticisms and developing a positive feminist rights theory is necessary if feminists are to find rights theories to be attractive candidate moral theories.2 In this paper I am concerned mostly with the first part of the project, responding to some feminist arguments against theorizing about morality in terms of rights, although in the course of responding to the objections I make remarks that might suggest ways in which some rights theories might be developed as feminist moral theories.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/0047-2786.00017 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Badness of Death, the Wrongness of Killing, and the Moral Importance of Autonomy.Samantha Brennan - 2001 - Dialogue 40 (4):723-738.
Reorienting Deliberation: Identity Politics in Multicultural Societies.Rebecca Mason - 2010 - Studies in Social Justice 4 (1):7-23.
Rights and Well-Being in Amartya Sen’s Value Theory.Jeffrey Spring - 2011 - Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (1):13-26.
Similar books and articles
Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory.Craig P. Dunn - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (2):133-147.
Your Daughter or Your Dog? A Feminist Assessment of the Animal Research Issue.Deborah Slicer - 1991 - Hypatia 6 (1):108-124.
Liberal Rights Theory and Social Inequality: A Feminist Critique.Lisa Schwartzman - 1999 - Hypatia 14 (2):26-47.
Feminist Ethical Theory.Virginia Held - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:41-49.
Collective Rights and Minority Rights.Seumas Miller - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
“The Stigma of Nation”: Feminist Just War, Privilege, and Responsibility.Marian Eide - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (2):pp. 48-60.
In Defense of the Jurisdiction Theory of Rights.Eric Mack - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):71-98.
Obligations to Animals Are Based on Rights.Tom Regan - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):171-180.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
131 ( #89,070 of 2,505,144 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,142 of 2,505,144 )
2009-01-28
Total views
131 ( #89,070 of 2,505,144 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,142 of 2,505,144 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads