Responding to allegations of scientific misconduct

Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):41-48 (2000)

Abstract
Institutions in France are not yet well prepared to respond to allegations of scientific misconduct. Following a serious allegation in late 1997. INSERM,* the primary organization for medical and health-related research in France, began to reflect on this subject, aided by scientists and jurists. The conclusions have resulted in establishing a procedure to be followed in cases of alleged misconduct, and also in reinforcing the application of good laboratory practices within each laboratory. Guidelines for authorship practices and scientific assessment must also be considered. Even though each institution must remain responsible for responding to allegations of scientific misconduct within its doors, INSERM would like to see national, European, and international co-ordination about the methods of such response.
Keywords Scientific misconduct  good laboratory practices  research institution
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-000-0021-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,999
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Accountability and Responsibility in Research.Patricia K. Woolf - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
53 ( #156,843 of 2,266,813 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #141,855 of 2,266,813 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature